QoE-Driven Data Communication Framework for Consumer Electronics in Tele-Healthcare System (2024)

Skip Abstract Section

1. [1] Sethuraman S. C., Kompally P., Mohanty S. P., and Choppali U., “MyWear: A novel smart garment for automatic continuous vital monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 214–222, Aug. 2021.Google ScholarDigital Library
2. [2] Kim H., Ben-Othman J., Mokdad L., Son J., and Li C., “Research challenges and security threats to AI-driven 5G virtual emotion applications using autonomous vehicles, drones, and smart devices,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 288–294, Nov./Dec. 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
3. [3] “TCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses‮” Accessed: Jul. 10, 2023. {[}Online{]}. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8684Google Scholar
4. [4] Lim Y., Nahum E. M., Towsley D., and Gibbens R. J., “ECF: An MPTCP path scheduler to manage heterogeneous paths,” in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Emerg. Netw. Exp. Technol. (CoNEXT), New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 147–159.Google Scholar
5. [5] Chodorek R. R. and Chodorek A., “MPTCP protocol misbehaviour in high-speed, uncongested network,” J. Marine Eng. Technol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 248–256, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
6. [6] Ferlin S., Kucera S., Claussen H., and Alay Ö., “MPTCP meets FEC: Supporting latency-sensitive applications over heterogeneous networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2005–2018, Oct. 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
7. [7] Coninck Q. D. and Bonaventure O., “Tuning multipath TCP for interactive applications on smartphones,” in Proc. IFIP Netw. Conf. Workshops, 2018, pp. 487–495.Google Scholar
8. [8] Jiang W.et al., “A wearable tele-health system towards monitoring COVID-19 and chronic diseases,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 15, pp. 61–84, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9390214Google Scholar
9. [9] Liu Y., Guo S., Yang Z., Hirata H., and Tamiya T., “A home-based tele-rehabilitation system with enhanced therapist-patient remote interaction: A feasibility study,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 4176–4186, Aug. 2022.Google Scholar
10. [10] Kim H. and Ben-Othman J., “Eco-friendly low resource security surveillance framework toward green AI digital twin,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 377–380, Jan. 2023.Google ScholarCross Ref
11. [11] Ye Y., Lee B., Flynn R., Xu J., Fang G., and Qiao Y., “Delay-based network utility maximization modelling for congestion control in named data networking,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2184–2197, Oct. 2021.Google ScholarDigital Library
12. [12] He B.et al., “Learning-based real-time transmission control for multi-path TCP networks,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1353–1369, Oct. 2023. doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2023.3287234.Google ScholarCross Ref
13. [13] Cao Y., Ji R., Ji L., Lei G., Wang H., and Shao X., “l2-MPTCP: A learning-driven latency-aware multipath transport scheme for industrial Internet applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 8456–8466, Dec. 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
14. [14] Thomas Y., Karaliopoulos M., Xylomenos G., and Polyzos G. C., “Low latency friendliness for multipath TCP,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 248–261, Feb. 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
15. [15] He B.et al., “DeepCC: Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning congestion control for multi-path TCP based on self-attention,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4770–4788, Dec. 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
16. [16] Palash M. R. and Chen K., “MPWiFi: Synergizing MPTCP based simultaneous multipath access and WiFi network performance,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 142–158, Jan. 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
17. [17] Balakiruthiga B. and Deepalakshmi P., “A simple congestion avoidance mechanism for OpenDaylight (ODL)–MPTCP network structure in software defined data center (SDDC),” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 2019, pp. 886–893.Google Scholar
18. [18] Zhong H., Dong P., Tang W., Yang B., and Xie J., “A short flows fast transmission algorithm based on MPTCP congestion control,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Security, Hohhot, China, 2020, pp. 786–797.Google Scholar
19. [19] Zhao Y., Cheng G., Zhang W., Chen X., and Li J., “BCTCP: A feedback-based congestion control method,” China Commun., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 13–25, Jun. 2020.Google Scholar
20. [20] Yang W., Dong P., Cai L., and Tang W., “Loss-aware throughput estimation scheduler for multi-path TCP in heterogeneous wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 3336–3349, May 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
21. [21] Wei W., Xue K., Han J., Wei D. S. L., and Hong P., “Shared bottleneck-based congestion control and packet scheduling for multipath TCP,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 653–666, Apr. 2020.Google ScholarDigital Library
22. [22] Yang J.et al., “TCCC: A throughput consistency congestion control algorithm for MPTCP in mixed transmission of long and short flows,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2652–2667, Sep. 2023. doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2023.3242419.Google ScholarDigital Library
23. [23] Paasch C., Ferlin S., Alay O., and Bonaventure O., “Experimental evaluation of multipath TCP schedulers,” in Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Capacity Sharing Workshop, 2014, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
24. [24] Kimura B. Y. L., Lima D. C. S. F., and Loureiro A. A. F., “Packet scheduling in multipath TCP: Fundamentals, lessons, and opportunities,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1445–1457, Mar. 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
25. [25] Dong E., Xu M., Fu X. M., and Cao Y., “A loss aware MPTCP scheduler for highly lossy networks,” Comput. Netw., vol. 157, pp. 146–158, Jul. 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
26. [26] Xing Y., Han J., Xue K., Liu J., Pan M., and Hong P., “MPTCP meets big data: Customizing transmission strategy for various data flows,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 35–41, Jul./Aug. 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
27. [27] Schmidt P. S., Enghardt T., Khalili R., and Feldmann A., “Socket intents: Leveraging application awareness for multi-access connectivity,” in Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Emerg. Netw. Exp. Technol., New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 295–300.Google Scholar
28. [28] Cao Y., Chen S., Liu Q., Zuo Y., Wang H., and Huang M., “QoE-driven energy-aware multipath content delivery approach for MPT CP-based mobile phones,” China Commun., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 90–103, Feb. 2017.Google Scholar
29. [29] “Linux_MPTCP‮” Accessed: Jul. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://multipath-tcp.org/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePageGoogle Scholar
30. [30] Zhang T., Zhao S., and Cheng B., “Multipath routing and MPTCP-based data delivery over MANETs,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 32652–32673, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
31. [31] Prakash M., Abdrabou A., and Zhuang W., “An experimental study on multipath TCP congestion control with heterogeneous radio access technologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 25563–25574, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
32. [32] “TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and fast recovery algorithms‮” Accessed: Jul. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2001Google Scholar
33. [33] Barik R., Welzl M., Ferlin S., and Alay O., “LISA: A linked slow-start algorithm for MPTCP,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2016, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
34. [34] Khalili R., Gast N., Popovic M., and Le Boudec J., “MPTCP is not Pareto-optimal: Performance issues and a possible solution,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1651–1665, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
35. [35] Cao Y., Xu M., and Fu X., “Delay-based congestion control for multipath TCP,” in Proc. 20th IEEE Int. Conf. Netw. Protocols (ICNP), Austin, TX, USA, 2012, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
36. [36] “Coupled congestion control for multipath transport protocols‮” Accessed: Jul. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6356Google Scholar
37. [37] Cardwell N., Cheng Y., Gunn C., Yeganeh S., and Jacobson V., “BBR: Congestion-based congestion control,” Commun. ACM, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 58–66, Feb. 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
38. [38] Hesmans B., duch*ene F., Paasch C., Detal G., and Bonaventure O., “Are TCP extensions middlebox-proof?,” in Proc. HotMiddleboxCoNEXT, 2013, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
39. [39] Zhang T. G., Zhao S., Cheng B., Ren B., and Chen J., “FEP: High fidelity experiment platform for mobile networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 3858–3871, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
40. [40] “Applying MPTCP to wireless edge networks‮” Accessed: Jul. 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ztguang/QccQms4MPTCP-V3Google Scholar

Index Terms

1. QoE-Driven Data Communication Framework for Consumer Electronics in Tele-Healthcare System

   1. Applied computing

      1. Life and medical sciences

         1. Health care information systems

   2. Networks

      See Also

      Consumer Electronics in the Netherlands

      1. Network types

   3. Software and its engineering

• A scalable mobile tele-consultation framework for enhancing healthcare access

  ACWR '11: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Wireless Technologies for Humanitarian Relief

  Access to healthcare is extremely poor in almost every region within India due to a variety of factors including large populations, substantially low presence of health care experts, lack of medical resources and economic constraints. The situation is ...

  Read More

• Consumer-Driven Technologies in Healthcare: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice

  Read More

• QoE Doctor: Diagnosing Mobile App QoE with Automated UI Control and Cross-layer Analysis

  IMC '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference

  Smartphones have become increasingly prevalent and important in our daily lives. To meet users' expectations about the Quality of Experience (QoE) of mobile applications (apps), it is essential to obtain a comprehensive understanding of app QoE and ...

  Read More